<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Martha Stewart &#187; imclone scandal</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.marthascomeback.com/review/imclone-scandal/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.marthascomeback.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 13:27:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Martha Stewart ImClone Stock</title>
		<link>http://www.marthascomeback.com/imclonestock.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.marthascomeback.com/imclonestock.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 May 2008 11:44:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Martha Stewart Fan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Financial Stocks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[imclone scandal]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marthascomeback.com/?p=4</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[


 ImClone scandal
Federal indictments and trial
In 2002, Stewart was under investigation for alleged insider trading             for selling 3,928 shares of ImClone Systems on December 27, 2001 &#8212;             an allegation that has [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>ImClone scandal</strong></p>
<p>Federal indictments and trial</p>
<p><a href="http://marthascomeback.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/05/mstewart.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-5" title="martha stewart imclone stock" src="http://marthascomeback.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/05/mstewart-225x300.jpg" alt="" width="225" height="300" /></a>In 2002, Stewart was under investigation for alleged insider trading             for selling 3,928 shares of ImClone Systems on December 27, 2001 &#8212;             an allegation that has never been substantiated nor prosecuted in a             court of law. On December 28, the Food and Drug Administration announced             it would not review ImClone&#8217;s application for Erbitux, which the company             touted as a promising cancer drug. ImClone&#8217;s stock plunged over 70%             in the month after the news came out. Stewart has been a friend of ImClone             founder Samuel Waksal, who has since pleaded guilty to six counts of             wrongdoing related to insider trading before the announcement. On June             6, 2002, the U.S. House Energy and Commerce Committee, which was already             investigating dubious ImClone trading, announced that it was probing             Stewart&#8217;s stock sale. On October 3, 2002, Stewart resigned from the             board of directors of the New York Stock Exchange. Through all the investigation             and allegation, Stewart kept her public persona intact, focusing on             her homemaking specialties and downplaying or ignoring the increasing             clamor for answers about her role in the scandal.<span id="more-4"></span></p>
<p>On June 4, 2003, a federal grand jury in Manhattan indicted Stewart             and her former broker Peter Bacanovic on nine criminal counts from the             Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). By selling when she did, the             government alleged Stewart avoided losses of $45,673. The charges included             securities fraud, obstruction of justice, and conspiracy. Stewart was             not indicted on the original charge of insider trading, but only for             the coverup that ensued. Stewart maintained her innocence, pleading             not guilty, saying she had a standing order with Bacanovic to sell her             shares if ImClone stock fell below $60. Stewart resigned as CEO and             chairman of Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia on the same day she was             indicted, but remained on the company&#8217;s board.</p>
<p>The day after her indictment, Stewart took out a full-page advertisement             in USA Today and launched a website with an open letter of defense &#8220;to             my friends and loyal supporters.&#8221; She said, &#8220;I want you to             know that I am innocent — and that I will fight to clear my name&#8230;             The government&#8217;s attempt to criminalize these actions makes no sense             to me&#8230; I am confident I will be exonerated of these baseless charges.&#8221;</p>
<p>The SEC later filed a related civil suit against Stewart with charges             of insider trading. Stewart&#8217;s trial was initially set for January 12,             2004, at the request of her lawyers who said they needed plenty of time             to analyze the evidence. The trial eventually began on January 20 In             New York City presided over by U.S. District Judge Miriam Goldman Cedarbaum.             During the trial, Stewart maintained her innocence.</p>
<p>On February 27, 2004, Judge Cederbaum threw out the charge of securities             fraud against Stewart. This was the most serious charge; it could have             led to up to 10 years in prison with a million dollar fine. The judge             called the charge &#8220;unfounded&#8221; and said that &#8220;no jury             could feasibly find it to be accurate.&#8221;</p>
<p>On March 5, 2004, Stewart was found guilty by a jury of eight women and four men on all four remaining counts against her: conspiracy, obstruction of justice, and two counts of making false statements. [2] (http://money.cnn.com/2004/03/05/news/companies/martha_verdict/index.htm) The maximum sentence for these convictions combined is 20 years in prison, though it is unlikely she will serve the maximum. The jury deliberated for three days following the five-week trial before reaching its verdict. Sentencing was set for June 17. Following Stewart&#8217;s conviction, a message was posted on her website, reading, in part, &#8220;I am obviously distressed by the jury&#8217;s verdict but I continue to take comfort in knowing that I have the confidence and enduring support of my family and friends. I will appeal the verdict and continue to fight to clear my name. I believe in the fairness of the judicial system and remain confident that I will ultimately prevail.&#8221;</p>
<p>Fallout after conviction</p>
<p>On March 8, 2004, Viacom pulled Martha Stewart Living from its CBS             and UPN affiliates, after having moved the show during Stewart&#8217;s trial             from prime daytime timeslots into less desirable early-morning slots             (e.g., 2:05am in New York). [3] (http://www.detnews.com/2004/entertainment/0403/09/f03-85522.htm)             On March 15, Martha Stewart resigned from the board of Martha Stewart             Living Omnimedia as a result of the conviction. On May 18, MSO announced             that the television show that had started the company, Martha Stewart             Living, was going on hiatus, with no announced date of return.</p>
<p>In an unrelated matter, Stewart faced more legal trouble in February             2004 as her company, Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia, was sued by Kmart             for allegedly &#8220;double-counting&#8221; royalty payments and advertising             spending. The companies signed a seven-year deal in 2001 to market Martha             Stewart Everyday brand home decorating, garden products, and housewares             through Kmart stores. Kmart filed for bankruptcy protection seven months             later and has since closed 600 of its 2,100 stores. On April 26, 2004,             Kmart withdrew its lawsuit, having reached an agreement with Martha             Stewart Living Omnimedia to amend the terms of the June 2001 contract             and to extend it through 2009.</p>
<p>On May 21, 2004, Larry Stewart (no relation), a United States Secret             Service lab director who testified for the government against Martha             Stewart, was charged with two counts of perjury. Stock in Martha Stewart             Living Omnimedia jumped as much as 23% on the news. Larry Stewart was             an expert witness about the ink on a broker&#8217;s worksheet, testifying             that the note about selling Imclone shares when it dropped below $60             was different from the rest of the ink on the document. The charges             arose when Susan Fortunato, a USSS coworker, complained that she had             in fact done the analysis and that it had never been examined by Stewart.             Although the jury at the perjury trial felt that Larry Stewart had taken             unfair credit for the work done, it did not amount to perjury and he             was found not guilty on October 5, 2004. The jury had trouble believing             Fortunato, feeling that she had an axe to grind with Stewart.</p>
<img src="http://marthascomeback.com/?ak_action=api_record_view&id=4&type=feed" alt="" /><table cellpadding=0 cellspacing=0><tr><td><a href="http://www.mb01.com/lnk.asp?o=1927&c=28729&a=2186">
<IMG SRC="http://www.mb01.com/getimage.asp?m=1880&o=1927&i=28729.dat" width=468 height=60 border=0>
</a></td></tr></table> ]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.marthascomeback.com/imclonestock.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
